tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12844144.post115290136951944313..comments2024-02-18T10:25:18.117-05:00Comments on The Kenilworthian: Sutovsky's Anti-Rubinstein 5.O-O!Michael Goellerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14512012158305281566noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12844144.post-1165800224221815042006-12-10T20:23:00.000-05:002006-12-10T20:23:00.000-05:00In the line 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bb5 Nd4 ...In the line 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bb5 Nd4 5.0-0 c6 6.Ba4 Qa5 7.Re1, do you have any coverage of 7...Nxf3 eliminating the tactic Nxd4 found in some of the other lines, or 7...b5, forcing the issue as in 7...Bb4 but sidestepping the 8.Nxd4 reply? (Although maybe that retains some sting: 8.Nxd4 bxa4 9.Nf5 d5 looks crazy for black, but is my first instinct. The idea is 10.exd5 Bxf5 11.Rxe5+ Be6 when perhaps white needs to play 12.Rxe6 fxe6 13.dxe6 to keep something going, but it doesn't look like enough to me. I suppose that 10.d4 would be worth a shot here.)<BR/><BR/>Maybe I can stop by your office and try this line out sometime. Although I came up with that analysis on the fly, and didn't check them against a computer yet.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com